mooseontheloose.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the mooseontheloose.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host mooseontheloose.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Compuweb Communications Services Limited .

the related websites

avcanada.ca ukcampsite.co.uk 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

by the home archives rss 8th february 2013 parental alienation syndrome (pas) a guide to the parental alienation syndrome by stan hayward fnf research officer what is it? the parental alienation syndrome (pas) is the systematic denigration by one parent by the other with the intent of alienating the child against the other parent. the purpose of the alienation is usually to gain or retain custody without the involvement of the father. the alienation usually extends to the father’s family and friends as well. dr. richard gardner in his book ‘the parental alienation syndrome’ states (p.74) “many of these children proudly state that their decision to reject their fathers is their own. they deny any contribution from their mothers. and the mothers often support this vehemently. in fact, the mothers will often state that they want the child to visit with the father and recognise the importance of such involvement, yet such a mother’s every act indicates otherwise. such children appreciate that, by stating the decision is their own, they assuage mothers guilt and protect her from criticism. such professions of independent thinking are supported by the mother who will often praise these children for being the kind of people who have minds of their own and are forthright and brave enough to express overtly their opinions. frequently, such mothers will exhort their children to tell them the truth regarding whether or not they really want to see their fathers. the child will usually appreciate that “the truth” is the profession that they hate the father and do not want to see him ever again. they thereby provide that answer – couched as “the truth” – which will protect them from their mother’s anger if they were to state what they really wanted to do, which is to see their fathers. it is important for the reader to appreciate that after a period of programming the child may not know what is the truth any more and come to actually believe that the father deserves the vilification being directed against him. the end point of the brainwashing process has then been achieved. how common is it? nearly every fnf member will have some experience of it. we have cases where children as young as two years old ‘claim’ not to want to see their father again, and cases where all children of one family will all decide that they do not wish to see their father again. it comes up to some degree in virtually every case where the father is attempting to get or extend contact, and most appeals will include aspect of pas being a factor in the stopping or disruption of access. why is it so common? it is a very effective legal device for getting custody. there are two reasons for this. first the children act of 1989 took more consideration of ‘the child’s wishes’, and secondly the child support agency separated the issues of court orders for maintenance and contact. a mother who stops or disrupts contact ‘defined by a court order’ is in contempt of court, and may be fined or jailed. there are no cases of this actually happening because the courts will state “it is of no benefit to the child for the mother to be punished”, but it does mean she may be repeatedly brought back to court for being obstructive. to overcome this she will state “the child does not wish to see the father”. a court welfare officer will then interview the child and report that the child has confirmed that it does not wish to see the father. the ‘child’s wishes’ will then be taken into consideration and the court will stop the fathers contact. the mother will be in the clear, the cwo will have reported the matter accurately, and the court will respond accordingly. the father will have lost contact, probably for several years until the child is old enough to become independent of the mother. in the majority of cases the child will then return to the father. interviews with adults who have been through this experience as children make the common statement that ‘they did not know how to cope with the situation, so avoided the father rather than hated him’. why don’t cwo’s recognise the situation? they do, but a napo (national association of probation offers) spokeswoman stated “napo has no policy on pas” meaning that though recognised, there is no clear cut action to be taken. if the cwo recommends family therapy it is expensive and time consuming. cwo do not have the time, the experience, or resources to do what needs to be done. they should interview the child out of the vicinity of both parents, and better, in the company of each parent separately. though they are authorised to do this, they rarely choose to do so. a common complaint of fnf members is that the cwo’s interviews are not carried out with the intent of getting the facts, but merely to go through the motions. most court reports will be drawn up with the intent of getting the result the cwo chooses rather than as information for the court to decide upon. is it officially recognised? there are two distinct aspects of pas; medical and legal. medically pas is a form of emotional child abuse. parents in hostile separations typically suffer depression, anger, and aggression. the expression of these feelings takes on the form of withdrawing love and communication. this extends to the children via the custodial parent. as a medical problem it is closely related to ‘false allegations of sexual abuse’ used to stop the father having contact; and to the ‘stockholm syndrome’ which describes the children as ‘hostages’ afraid of the mother, and obeying her as a means of survival. there are also aspects of ‘false memory syndrome’ whereby the child may be instilled with false memories of the father. legally pas is recognised as a behaviour pattern but often goes under other names such as ‘coaching, prejudicing, rehearsing’ and synonyms of brainwashing. although recognised by the courts it is rarely acted upon because as a form of emotional abuse it is very difficult to define, and would require bringing in social services. the other forms of child abuse are physical, sexual, and neglect, and are easily identified by expert witnesses. emotional abuse can only be registered as part of these. some courts will act upon it, but do so by simply ignoring the mothers claims of ‘the childs wishes’ and indicate that she is being obstructive. the more enlightened courts will order family therapy, and ensure that visitation rights are kept. anyone claiming pas should always look for family therapy as a way forward. although pas is currently recognised, but not acted upon, it is actually a crime to ‘incite hatred on the basis of colour, religion, or creed’ . also the government is considering making ‘stalking’ a crime on the basis of ’emotional abuse’. in the usa one father had maintenance suspended on the grounds that his daughter ‘hated’ him even though he had made every reasonable effort to form a relationship with her. such an approach by the courts here would prevent pas being used as a loophole in the law. official comments on pas a spokeswoman for the home office ‘probation service division states: “both the home office and the court welfare service are also aware of the fact that parents may seek to manipulate their children and encourage them to make statements designed to lessen the chances of the absent parent being granted contact with the child. where an officer suspects that such coaching or manipulation has taken place, he or she will take this into account when preparing the welfare report and ensure that it is brought to the courts attention”. a spokesman for the dept. of health said: “the potential for alienation by feuding parents is a commonly recognised problem” a spokeswoman for the inst. of family therapy said: “with one parent gone, their fear is that they will be abandoned by the other, so they say whatever the present parent wishes to hear”, and “when children under twelve are forced to choose, they tend to align with the parent they are living with”. a

URL analysis for mooseontheloose.co.uk

https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/most-affiliate-networks-are-sycophantic-fairweather-friends.html#respond
https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/google-adwords-sanctimonious-arrogant-whited-sepulchre.html
https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/category/affiliate-marketing
https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/stephen-blandford-ryman-shipleys-llp-insolvency-practitioners-www-shipleys-com.html
https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/comments/feed
https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/affiliate-marketing-industry-deteriorated-another-nail-in-the-coffin.html#respond
https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/criminal-laws-against-mums-that-unjustly-stop-dads-seeing-their-children.html
https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/category/a-mooses-life
https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/retirement-age-rise-plan-work-till-you-drop.html#comments
https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/parental-alienation-syndrome-pas.html
https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/richard-odwyer-should-not-be-extradicted-should-google-be-prosecuted-instead.html#respond
https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/category/mooses-proverbs
https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/family-justice-review-panel-www-justice-gov-uk.html
https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/most-affiliate-networks-are-sycophantic-fairweather-friends.html
https://www.mooseontheloose.co.uk/family-justice-review-panel-www-justice-gov-uk.html#respond
gogo-electrical.co.uk
christmasshoppinguk.co.uk
gogo-uk.co.uk
computer-hardware-store.co.uk
whooshuk.co.uk
book-shop-uk.co.uk
homesweetshop.co.uk
roalddahlbook.co.uk
electrical-store-uk.co.uk
office-supply-uk.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
mooseontheloose.co.uk

Registrant:
Identity Protect Limited

Registrant type:
UK Limited Company, (Company number: 7407280)

Registrant's address:
PO Box 786
Hayes
Middlesex
UB3 9TR
United Kingdom

Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 28-Sep-2017

Registrar:
123-Reg Limited t/a 123-reg [Tag = 123-REG]
URL: http://www.123-reg.co.uk

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 14-Nov-2006
Expiry date: 14-Nov-2026
Last updated: 28-Sep-2017

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
ns.123-reg.co.uk 212.67.202.2
ns2.123-reg.co.uk 62.138.132.21

WHOIS lookup made at 18:12:29 18-Oct-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS mooseontheloose.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

OWNER

  ORGANIZATION Identity Protect Limited

TYPE
UK Limited Company, (Company number: 7407280)

ADDRESS
PO Box 786
Hayes
Middlesex
UB3 9TR
United Kingdom
Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 28-Sep-2017

DOMAIN

  SPONSOR 123-Reg Limited t/a 123-reg [Tag = 123-REG]

  CREATED 2006-11-14

  CHANGED 2017-09-28

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  NS.123-REG.CO.UK 212.67.202.2

  NS2.123-REG.CO.UK 62.138.132.21

  NAME mooseontheloose.co.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .